Posts|Comments

How Much Are You Willing to Pay for Twinkies?

Would you support a 'fat tax' on unhealthy foods?

Would a 17.5% price increase deter you from eating your favorite unhealthy treats? The UK thinks so. Researchers conducted studies and predicted the results of their proposed "fat tax," and they found that their plan could save 3,200 lives per year. How? Well, 30% of deaths from coronary heart disease are caused by unhealthy diets, and they say if unhealthy foods were more expensive, people would be forced to turn to more healthy alternatives.

That's where the problem comes in: "forced." The idea was first pitched to Tony Blair in 2004, and he quickly dismissed it, saying, "People don't want to live in a nanny state."

But, the Department of Public Health at Oxford University is back at it again, lobbying for a "fat tax" that they insist will save lives. They have come up with a scoring system that assigns a certain value to each food. The 17.5% tax would be applied to all fatty, sugary, or salty foods that scored below a certain threshold on the scale. The predicted 3,000+ saved lives would translate to a nearly 2% decrease in nationwide heart attacks and strokes.

This is a tough subject, because it promotes and encourages a healthier diet, but is it also taking away food options for lower income families? A lot of the foods that score low on their "fat tax" meter would be the same processed and vacuum packed meals that many families survive on.

What do you think? Would you support a "fat tax" where you live?

Related Posts

Did you like this article? You can get the complete text of all the latest FitBuff articles in your email inbox each morning by entering your email address below. Your address will only be used for mailing you the articles, and each one will include a link so you can unsubscribe at any time:
Free Total Mind and
Body Fitness
Newsletter

5 Comments

Write a Comment»
  1. Posted July 15, 2007 at 12:13 am | Permalink
    1

    I hope the US will implement something like this too. Japan increased tobacco tax to at least 20% last year to curb the death toll caused by lung cancer.

  2. Posted July 15, 2007 at 11:13 am | Permalink
    2

    Oh, don't get me started on tobacco tax — that should be increased to 2000%!

    But I do sympathize a little if what the critics to the fat tax say are true: Lower income families survive predominantly on cheap, vacuum-packed foods, which are the same foods that would be more expensive.

    An even better solution, though probably not nearly as likely, was a suggestion from a UK nutritionist asked about the fat tax. He said instead of raising the prices on unhealthy foods, we should reward healthy eaters by lowering the prices of more nutritious foods!

  3. Morty
    Posted September 19, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink
    3

    To answer your question, there are times when I would pay A LOT of money for Twinkies! lol I have to indulge every ONCE in a while…

  4. Travis
    Posted September 22, 2007 at 3:19 am | Permalink
    4

    Ugh! I don't see how anyone could even put one of those things in their mouths!

  5. Miguel
    Posted October 21, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink
    5

    I say go for it. Junk food is just as bad as cigarettes. They aren't going to give it up so we might as well profit from their ignorant spending.

4 Trackbacks

  1. 1

    […] presents How Much Are You Willing to Pay for Twinkies? posted at FitBuff.com's Total Mind and Body Fitness Blog, saying, "Most people shudder […]

  2. By 18th Carnival of Money Stories! on July 16, 2007 at 1:26 am
    2

    […] not FitBuff as he ponders the legislative efforts in the UK for a proposed "fat tax" in How Much Are You Willing to Pay for Twinkies? […]

  3. 3

    […] presents How Much Are You Willing to Pay for Twinkies? posted at FitBuff.com's Total Mind and Body Fitness Blog. Many people shudder at the word […]

  4. 4

    […] FlashBack: How Much Are You Willing to Pay for Twinkies? UK health officials say a "fat tax" could save over 3,000 lives per year! 1 Views […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*